The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan A Necessary...

On August 6 and August 9, 1945, the cities and people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would experience something that no other people had ever experienced before, and no other people have experienced since. Within three days in the month of August 1945 and nearing the end of World War II, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would become the testing ground and their people the test dummies for a new kind of war weapon; the atomic bomb. Was this act necessary to bring an end to World War II as has been claimed? No, it was not. For months, many of Japan’s cities had suffered a never-ending attack of weapons raining down on them by American military forces. In March of 1945, the city of Tokyo was attacked and 16 square miles of the city was†¦show more content†¦The end of the war looked to be just around the corner. But how much did that matter to those that wanted to see just what their new creation of the atom bomb could really do? In April of 1945, Kantaro Suzuki had taken over as head of the Japanese government and made it his top priority to put an end to the war. He knew when Germany surrendered, the focus of American and British forces would be turned to Japan. His people were already suffering enough and enough of his country had been destroyed before his eyes, and he wanted the devastation and anguish to end. By June of 1945, the United States had been dropping bomb after bomb on many of the cities of Japan without any real sort of retaliation from the Japanese for over six months (Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Wikipedia). Why? Because by then, Japan’s military forces had all but cease to exist. Cities had been reduced to ruins by the never-ending attacks. Bombs fell out of the sky like rain from storm clouds. Production of weapons, or anything, in what was left of buildings and factories that once stood was virtually impossible (Weber). A fourth of the population was left homeless and near death from starvation. Transportation was practically nonexistent. The country of Japan was on the verge of collapse, and they knew it. Little did they know it was only going to get worse. By now, the American military had long ago broken theShow MoreRelatedThe Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima871 Words   |  4 PagesAn Unnecessary Action The atomic bombing of Japan was an unjustified decision that many considered was inhumane. Through the use of atomic bombs, many innocents were harmed in one way or another. Berger described the atomic bombing of Hiroshima as a terrorist act and that it was evil. While Berger s argument was extreme, the U.S. still remains unjustified because they did not know exactly how much damage the bomb would actually cause. Bombing Japan, the U.S. harmed thousands of civiliansRead MoreThe War Of The World War II1802 Words   |  8 PagesOne of the most unfortunate yet necessary aspects of leading a nation is facing the prospect of war. As devastating as war can be, it often is key to ensuring a nation s freedom and protection. One war that was certainly devastating on both sides of the battlefield was World War II. The tension in the Japanese-American relationship had been boiling for a while, between the military blockade of Japan, and Japan’s intrusion into China in direct violati on of the Open-Door policy, but the attack onRead MoreAtomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki2413 Words   |  10 Pagesto be won in the Pacific. Japan was aware that the Third Reich had fallen, but had refused to surrender to the allies. This had created a huge issue for the allies, primarily the United States, who was taking the brunt of the conflict in the Pacific. The United States method of war in the Pacific, Island Hopping, had so far been a success, despite huge loss of life on the side of the United States as well as the Japanese. Even with the crushing defeats suffered by Japan, surrender was not an optionRead More Truman, the Atomic Bomb, and the Shaping of the Postwar World6419 Words   |  26 Pagesthe Atomic Bomb, and the Shaping of the Postwar World ABSTRACT Historians have questioned the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan in 1945. Evidence shows that President Truman weighed not only military information in his decision to use the bomb, but also considered postwar politics and foreign policy when he considered dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. An analysis of his personal papers offers a different reasoning for using the bomb than what was commonly known at the time. The discrepancyRead MoreTheme in Literature Essay4725 Words   |  19 Pagesof raw materials and food affected only European citizens. T F 5 The United States’ general strategy was to defeat Japan first, and then fight the war in Europe. T F 6 The day Allied troops crossed the Rhine river and entered Germany is commonly Referred to as â€Å"D-Day.† T F 7 President Roosevelt ordered the military to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. T F 8 The United Nations was conceived during the closing months of the war as a world peacekeeping authorityRead MoreNational Security Outline Essay40741 Words   |  163 Pagesto protect people from the national government -Protection of people extends to US citizens abroad as well (First US â€Å"war† - Barbary Pirates that were harassing US ships in Mediterranean) -Resources -Centers around protection of resources necessary for military capabilities -Other resources US willing to use force to protect: Oil (note actions taken by US to protect oil), worldwide economic access -Ideals -Many Americans (since nation was founded) view that protection of certain fundamentalRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 PagesYork City Landscape Gerda Lerner, Fireweed: A Political Autobiography Allida M. Black, ed., Modern American Queer History Eric Sandweiss, St. Louis: The Evolution of an American Urban Landscape Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past Sharon Hartman Strom, Political Woman: Florence Luscomb and the Legacy of Radical Reform Michael Adas, ed., Agricultural and Pastoral Societies in Ancient and Classical History Jack Metzgar, Striking

Cross Cultural Management- Dancom Case Study - 2037 Words

Drawing on theories of both cross cultural management and motivation, discuss the factors influencing the contrasting behaviour of both the hosting insiders and outsiders at Dancom. What could be done to help the outsiders become more involved? To understand the case we have to first understand the theories of cross culture management and motivation.... we would be later on moving to the introduction and issues at Dancom. The last but not the least would be the suggestions and their implication in relation to the â€Å"outsiders† at Dancom along with the mentioned theories. When a company goes to other country for business there is lot of capital and resources that are invested. There is a very famous saying that â€Å"when in Rome do as Romans†¦show more content†¦Subsequent studies by others covered students in 23 countries, elites in 19 countries, commercial airline pilots in 23 countries, up-market consumers in 15 countries, and civil service managers in 14 countries. Together these studies identified and validated four independent dimensions of national culture differences, with a fifth dimension added later. He has found five dimensions of national culture in his study. These dimensions of national culture are Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty avoidance, Long term orientation. These cultural differences describe averages or tendencies and not characteristics of individuals Following are the five dimensions of national culture: Small vs. Large Power Distance: The first dimension indicates the extent to which a society can dominate, to what extent a society can exploit and the unequal distribution of power. The extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. Small power distance (e.g. Austria, Denmark) expect and accept power relations that are more consultative or democratic. People relate to one another more as equals regardless of formal positions. Subordinates are more comfortable with and demand the right to contribute to and critique the decision making of those in higher positions. In large power distance countries

Symbolism in the Pearl free essay sample

There was a lot of symbolism in chapter 6 of The Pearl, and most of it is very strong. When Coyotito died it symbolized sadness and anger. Kino was sad because it was his first and only child, and Coyotito was very important to him. He was also angry because he died because of the pearl. Coyotito’s death finally made Kino realize that the pearl was evil and it was destroying his life. He then knew that he had to throw it away to make the evil go away. Juana and Coyotito symbolize security to Kino, because they were always there for him. They went with him on the journey he took, and stayed with him through many roads and through mountains. Even when trackers were following them, they stayed with Kino instead of hiding. They were important to Kino because they gave him strength throughout the hardships the pearl brought. We will write a custom essay sample on Symbolism in the Pearl or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page They also made it harder for Kino to throw away the Pearl because he wanted them to have a better life. He thought the pearl would make them rich and Juana would have better clothes, and Coyotito would go to school. Kino’s knife symbolizes protection and security because it can protect him and his family. His knife is important to him because it is the only weapon that he has that can fight the trackers. The trackers symbolize evil because they are trying to catch Kino and his family. They try really hard, and chase Kino from home all the way to the mountains. The journey Kino takes to escape from trackers symbolizes his hope and his will for happiness. He is also greedy, but he is desperate for a better life and not to be poor. The pearl symbolizes hope, greed, and evil for Kino. Kino really hopes for a better life where he is not living in poverty. His hope drives him on, and it makes it hard for him to let it go, even if the pearl is evil. When he has the pearl he turns greedy, and he will do anything to have it so he can be rich. If he was not so greedy, and he got rid of the pearl earlier, his life would be better. Coyotito wouldn’t have died, and he might still have his house. The pearl symbolizes evil and ruined Kino’s life because he became too greedy and wouldn’t throw it back until it was too late and Coyotito died. When Kino finally threw the pearl back into the ocean, it symbolizes him giving up. It was like Kino giving up the evil and also all of all the hope he had for the pearl. But the pearl was evil and he realized he needed to throw it away. It cost too much for him, like his canoe, his house and finally his own child’s life. He realized he needed to get rid of the evil that the pearl contained. But when he threw it away, he was throwing away his only chance of getting wealthy and having a better life. But it was the best choice, and he chose to go back to how he used to live, which better than how he lived with the pearl anyway.